Law & Humanities Blog


Latina Lawyers Before the Supreme Court: An Updated Abstract

Posted: 02 Jun 2011 09:10 AM PDT

Maria G. Mendoza has updated the abstract of her paper, The Thirteen Known Latina Litigants Before the Supreme Court of the United States, on SSRN. Here is the updated abstract.

From 1935 to 2010, only thirteen known Latinas have argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The first known Latina to argue before the United States, Miriam Naveira Merly, then serving as the Solicitor General to Puerto Rico, argued before the High Court in 1975. A year later, Vilma Martinez, the first known Mexican American woman to appear before the Supreme Court, argued East Texas Motor Freight Sys., v. Rodriguez, marking the last time the 1970s was known to entertain an appearance by a Latina advocate. Over the course of the 1980s, six Latinas are known to have litigated before the Court, and sadly, the 1990s only brought one known appearance by a Latina before the High Court. From 2000 to 2010, four known Latinas have argued before the Supreme Court.



Before the Supreme Court, these Latinas took on everything from the battles of the downtrodden and the impoverished – including the legal woes of the Latino community – and they took on the causes of the government. After defying odds and breaking down barriers, these Latinas went on to become the "firsts" to hold particular positions such as judgeships, Ambassador to Argentina, law school professor, and appellate attorney. They are perhaps the most underrepresented demographic to appear before the Court, which is unfortunate, because Latinas are now part of the nation's largest, youngest, and fastest growing minority in the United States. Historically, advocates from all walks of life have powerfully shaped our nation's laws to reflect the values, priorities and character of the American people, and the Supreme Court bar and greater legal profession must act aggressively to ensure that "we the people" continue to contribute to the development of the law.



These Latinas who powerfully shaped our laws deserve to go down in history along with the other "firsts" and champions of the Supreme Court, but unfortunately, never before has there been an attempt to learn who was the "first" Latina to argue before the Supreme Court or learn about the history of Latina litigants before the High Court. By interviewing these Latina litigants about their formative experiences, entry into the legal profession, and the pathway these remarkable Latinas took to present their argument before the High Court, this article tries to understand why so few Latinas have argued before the Supreme Court. Part one of this article addresses the lack of research on Latinas before the Court, and why caring about the history of Latina litigants before the Supreme Court matters.
Part two of this article looks both at the salient barriers and opportunities that made it possible for these Latinas to argue before the Court, and part three of this article focuses on the life and career of these Latina litigants. Part four of this article describes how the dearth of appearances by Latina advocates is highly influenced by the rise of a small group of elite lawyers who focus on Supreme Court cases, the Court's shrinking docket, and the bleak state of Latinas in the legal profession.The full text of the paper is not available on SSRN.

John M. Finnis On Legal Philosophy

Posted: 02 Jun 2011 09:06 AM PDT

John Finnis, University of Oxford Faculty of Law, and Notre Dame Law School, has published Philosophy of Law: Introduction, in John M. Finnis, 4 Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays (Oxford University Press, 2011). Here is the abstract.


This Introduction to my 'Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays Volume IV' (Oxford University Press 2011), published in the United Kingdom in early April, and in the United States in early May 2011, introduces the volume's 22 published and unpublished essays, and follows the volume's division into four Parts: Foundations of Law's Authority; Theories and Theorists of Law; Legal Reasoning; and the Two Senses of "Legal System."



The first half of the Introduction is, in effect, a brief new essay on the foundations of the positivity of positive law, revisiting issues taken up in chapter I of Natural Law and Natural Rights and issues involved in the so-called sources thesis and in the labeling of theories as "positivist." Later parts of the Introduction indicate some patterns emergent in the volume's many essays on particular theorists and theories; review the bearing of the "one-right answer" thesis on legal reasoning and some prime examples of judicial misreasoning; and the relation of the idea of "legal system" to issues around the emergence of independent states in the British Empire, and around Britain's absorption into and subjection to the European Union.



The Introduction, like the volume, intersects with the Introductions to, and contents of, each of the other volumes in the five-volume set, which is published just before the second edition of Natural Law and Natural Rights, reformatted to accompany the set and incorporating a 65-page Postscript. The Collected Essays are I Reason in Action, II Intention and Identity, III Human Rights and Common Good, IV Philosophy of Law, V Religion and Public Reasons. Each volume includes the index for the set, and the author's bibliography.
Download the text from SSRN at the link.
Bookmark and Share

Blog Archive