Law & Humanities Blog


Body Talk

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 09:46 AM PDT

Genevieve Lakier, University of Chicago Law School, is publishing Sport as Speech in the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming). Here is the abstract.

Sports play a tremendously important role in American public culture, yet games of spectator sport are not generally recognized as expression protected by the First Amendment. This is notwithstanding the extension in recent years of First Amendment protection to a wide variety of other kinds of nonverbal art and entertainment. This Article argues that the denial of free speech protection to spectator sport is wrong both doctrinally and when considered in light of the aims and purposes of the First Amendment. Drawing upon an extensive body of social scientific research examining the practice and cultural significance of spectator sports, it argues that games communicate the sorts of messages to which First Amendment protection extends. In providing viewers dramatic spectacles of victory and defeat, and in offering fans a symbol around which to rally around, spectator sports also reflect and help shape public attitudes and beliefs about individual excellence, political community and identity, race, gender, and sexuality — even competition itself. The Article argues that the same justifications that support the extension of First Amendment protection to art and entertainment therefore support extending protection to spectator sport, and that the exclusion of spectator sports from the category of expressive conduct furthers none of the purposes of the First Amendment.
Instead, it merely distorts the doctrine, by relying on an ultimately unjustifiable distinction between artistic and athletic performance, and live and mediated speech.Download the full text of the article from SSRN at the link.

Legal Positivism and the Pluralist Legal World

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 09:39 AM PDT

Mauro Zamboni, Stockholm University Faculty of Law, has published 'A Legal Pluralist World'… or the Black Hole for Modern Legal Positivism. Here is the abstract.

One can see how the modern legal positivism, on one hand, is in front of a reality of legal globalization and increasing legal pluralism in many areas of law, that is a reality (e.g. soft-law) challenging some of the fundamental paradigms endorsed by this legal movement (e.g. the pedigree thesis). On the other hand, modern legal positivists have taken a quite passive attitude toward this challenge, either by abandoning the legal positivism as a whole to its destiny or by simply continuing to focus upon traditional (i.e. pre-globalization) issues as the fundamental ones to be tackled.
In this respect, the goal of this paper is certainly neither to tackle these potential dangers hanging over the modern legal positivism's future nor to rewrite the basic dogmas characterizing legal positivism. The goal is much humbler: to suggest a shift of attention among legal positivists towards questions which have always been present in their program (though often in secondary terms), as also their solutions (often already present in the legal positivist works). This shift would possibly help the legal positivism movement to circumvent the black hole represented by legal globalization (and its legal pluralism), a black hole where the distinction between law and non-law (i.e. the major tenant of legal positivism and, I would dare say, of the modern Western legal culture) seems to vanish, putting the very existence and legitimacy of the legal phenomenon under question.
In order to fulfill this task, this paper will start in Part One by describing what it means nowadays to have a legal positivist approach and in particular what its core message to the legal (and non-legal) community is. In this respect, Herbert L. A. Hart's idea as to the nature and role of the rule of recognition will be briefly sketched. Once it has been established what being a legal positivist actually means, Part Two will present some of the reasons why the ongoing process of globalization, and the consequent establishment of a pluralist legal world, appears to threaten some of the fundamental tenants of modern legal positivism (or, as I will try to show, "supposedly fundamental" tenants). Finally, in Part Three, some changes of focus in the legal positivist program will be suggested, in order for this legal theoretical movement not only to be able to survive the challenges of the legal globalization but also in order for it to keep its predominant position among the legal actors in a pluralist legal world.
Download the full text of the paper from SSRN at the link. 
Read More... Law & Humanities Blog

Law & Humanities Blog


Lost In Translation

Posted: 29 Apr 2013 08:34 AM PDT

Andy Martin muses on the difficulty of translation for the Opinion section of the New York Times. Think about how much more treacherous the task is in law, in which a great deal of what we cling to is words and the methods in which we fit them together. 
Read More... Law & Humanities Blog

Law & Humanities Blog


New Books On Law and the Humanities From DeGruyter

Posted: 25 Apr 2013 09:05 AM PDT

New books available from DeGruyter:

Karen-Margrethe Simonsen has edited Law and Justice in Literature, Film and Theatre: Nordic Perspectives (Law & Literature; 5). 






Aims and Scope

This volume is a Nordic contribution to research on law and humanities. It treats the legal culture of the Nordic countries through intensive analyses of canonical Nordic artworks. Law and justice have always been important issues in Nordic literature, film and theater from the Icelandic sagas through Ludvig Holberg and Henrik Ibsen to Lars Noréns theatre and Lars von Trier's Dogme films of today. This book strives to answer two fundamental questions: Is there a special Nordic justice? And what does the legal and literary/aesthetic culture of the North mean for the concept of law and justice and for the understanding of the interdisciplinary exchange of law and humanities? The concept of law and literature as a research area was originally developed in countries of common law. This book investigates law and humanities from a different legal tradition, and contributes thus both to the discussion of the general and the comparative studies of law and humanities.




Table of Contents

Karen-Margrethe Simonsen
Preface 1
Ian Ward
Crossing Borders 5
Ditlev Tamm
Law and Literature in a Nordic Legal Perspective 11
Hans Hauge
Nordic Sameness and Difference 25
Peter Garde
"With Laws Shall Our Land Be Built Up".
The Law in the Sagas – Ideal and Failure 45
Toomas Kotkas
Two Conceptions of Justice in the Kalevala: A Nietzschean Reading 63
Arild Linneberg
From Natural Law To The Nature Of Laws: Ludvig Holberg 77
Karen-Margrethe Simonsen
The Confession of a Judge.
On Narrative Desire and Law in Steen Steensen Blicher's Early Crime Story
"the Pastor of Vejlbye" 85
Bjarne Markussen
Contesting Narratives: Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House and Trygve Allister
Diesen's Hold My Heart 103
Ari Hirvonen
The Subject of the Law 119
Helle Porsdam
From 'Law and Literature' to 'Law and Humanities': Transatlantic Dialogues
on Film – the Case of Lars von Trier 149
vi Contents
List of contributors 167








Aims and Scope

The past few decades in legal and literary studies have challenged the boundaries raised by the different concepts of law and literature espoused by a great variety of theorists. Law's traditionally assumed disciplinary autonomy has been challenged by those who have pursued interdisciplinary methods of research. In particular, the concept of the sublime has moved out of the strictly philosophical and literary fields and crossed the borders between disciplines, finding an application also in the juridical field. On one hand, this volume proposes that the ethical aspect involved in the legal sublime is to contain the arrogance of the law. On the other hand, the volume draws attention to the "and" of interdisciplinary literary-legal studies and offers new daring comparisons between philosophical fields and between apparently distant historical periods.





Table of Contents

Daniela Carpi
Introduction 1: The Sublime of Law fi 1
Jeanne Gaakeer
Introduction 2: On the Threshold and Beyond:
An Introductory Observation fi 15
Cristina Costantini
Representing Law: Narrative Practices, Poetic Devices, Visual Signs and the
Aesthetics of the Common Law Mind fi 27
Maria Aristodemou
Bare Law Between Two Lives: José Saramago and Cornelia Vismann on Naming,
Filing and Cancelling fi 37
Melanie Williams
Liminal Tensions in Public to Private Conceptions of Justice: Nussbaum, Woolf
and the Struggle for Identity fi 53
Julián Jiménez Heffernan
"Under the Force of the Law": Communal Imagination and the Constitutional
Sublime in Walter Scott's The Bride of Lammermoor fi 73
Jeanne Clegg
Moll Flanders,Ordinary's Accounts and Old Bailey Proceedings fi 95
Sidia Fiorato
Ariel and Caliban as Law-conscious Servants Longing for Legal
Personhood fi 113
Laura Apostoli
Altered Bodies, Fragmented Selves: Reconstructing the Subject in Fay Weldon's
The Cloning of Joanna May fi 129
Jeanne Gaakeer
The Business of Law and Literature: to Compose an Order, to Imagine
Man fi 149
Daniela Carpi
Renaissance into Postmodernism: Anticipations of Legal Unrest fi 177


Conference On Law and Literature In Diaspora Studies To Take Place in May, 2013

Posted: 25 Apr 2013 08:48 AM PDT

Dr. Daniela Carpi, University of Verona, and President of the Associazione Italiana Diretto e Letteratura announces a Conference on Law and Literature in Diaspora Studies, May 6-9, 2013. Details below. More information available by clicking on the link here.


CENTRO ITALO-TEDESCO
DEUTSCH-ITALIENISCHES ZENTRUM



Law and Literature in Diaspora Studies

Villa Vigoni-Gespräche

Villa Vigoni, 6-9 MAY 2013

programme

Programm und Teilnehmerliste / Programme and Participants:


Monday, 06 May 2013
19.00 Welcome Reception, Aperitif
19.30 Dinner

Tuesday, 07 May 2013
9.30   Opening addresses
Prof. Dr.
Immacolata Amodeo, Generalsekretärin, Villa Vigoni
Prof. Dr. Daniela Carpi (Verona), Convenor
Prof. Dr. Klaus Stierstorfer (Münster), Convenor
9.30   Opening Discussion: Set-up, Procedures, Possible Outcome
All Participants
Chair: Profs Carpi and Stierstorfer
10.30  Coffee break
11.00  Forum 1 – Theorizing diaspora from the perspective of 'law and literature'
Chair: Prof. Dr. Fabian Wittreck (Münster)
Prof. Dr. Leif Dahlberg (Stockholm)
Prof. Dr. Jeanne Gaakeer (Rotterdam)
Prof. Dr. Peter Schneck (Osnabrück)
Forum 1 – Plenary discussion
13.00-14.30       Lunch
14.30  Forum 2 – Theorizing the law from the perspective of 'literary diaspora studies'
Chair: Prof. Dr. Klaus Stierstorfer (Münster)
Prof. Dr. Avtar Brah (London)
Prof. Dr. Janet Wilson (Northampton)
16.00  Coffee break
16.30  Forum 2 – continued
Dr. Franziska Quabeck (Münster)
Prof. Dr. Sridhar Rajeswaran (CASII, India)
18.00  Concluding discussion
19.30 Dinner



Wednesday, 08 May 2013
9.30   Forum 3 – Theorizing literature from the perspective of 'legal diaspora studies'
Chair: Prof. Dr. Paola Carbone
Dr. Sidia Fiorato (Verona)
Emma Patchett, M.A. (Münster)
Dr. Riccardo Baldissone (London)
11.00  Coffee break
11.15  Keynote: Prof. Dr. Melanie Williams (Exeter)
11.45  Forum 3 – Discussion
13.00-14.30       Lunch
14.30  Forum 4 – Conceptual common ground between legal studies, literary studies, and diaspora studies
Chair: Prof. Dr. Daniela Carpi (Verona)
Prof. Dr. Nilufer Bharucha (Mumbai)
16.00  Coffee break
16.30  Forum 4 – continued
Prof. Dr. Pier Giuseppe Monateri (Torino)
Prof. Dr. Fabian Wittreck (Münster)
18.00  Closing panel discussion: Resume, Outcomes
19.30 Dinner

Thursday, 09 May 2013
9.30   Forum 5 – Prospectus: Methodological, terminological, and conceptual desiderata
Chair: Prof. Dr. Jeanne Gaakeer (Rotterdam)
Dr. Florian Kläger (Münster)
Dr. Karen-Margrethe Simonsen (Aarhus)
Dr. Chiara Battisti (Verona)
13.00-14.30       Lunch
Departure


Busman's Holiday

Posted: 25 Apr 2013 08:23 AM PDT

Mary Whisner, University of Washington School of Law, has published Bitten by the Reading Bug, at 105 Law Library Journal 113. Here is the abstract.

I read a lot in my spare time; sometimes my reading includes books about law. This essay discusses a number of recent books and explores how such reading can be helpful for a reference librarian. I begin with James E. Clapp et al., Lawtalk (2011), a wide-ranging book that uses colorful legal terms as springboards for discussions of legal history or policy. And then I have briefer discussions of books related to some of the topics in Lawtalk:
  • Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (2010)
  • Alexandra Natapoff, Snitching: Criminal Informants and the Erosion of American Justice (2009)
  • David E. Stannard, Honor Killing: How the Infamous "Massie Affair" Transformed Hawai'i (2005)
  • Three memoirs about death penalty work:
    • Andrea D. Lyon, Angel of Death Row: My Life as a Death Penalty Defense Lawyer (2010)
    • David R. Dow, Autobiography of an Execution (2010)
    • Ian Graham, Unbillable Hours (2010)
  • Mark Prothero, Defending Gary (2006)
  • Death Penalty Stories (John H. Blume & Jordan M. Streiker eds., 2009) and Legal Ethics Stories (Deborah L. Rhode & David Luban eds., 2006)
  • Shon Hopwood, Law Man
  • Download the full text of the article from SSRN at the link.

    Tracking the Rise of Law As a Scholarly Discipline

    Posted: 25 Apr 2013 08:18 AM PDT

    Hans-Bernd Schaefer, Bucerius Law School, University of Hamburg, and Alexander J. Wulf, Bucerius Law School, have published Jurists, Clerics and Merchants: The Rise of Learned Law in Medieval Europe and Its Impact on Economic Growth. Here is the abstract.

    Between the years 1200 and 1600 economic development in most parts of Europe gained momentum. By the end of this period per capita income in Western Europe (excluding Orthodox countries) was well above the income levels in all other regions of the world. We relate this unique development to the resurrection of Roman law, which went hand in hand with the rise of law as a scholarly and scientific discipline. In this paper we investigate two competing hypothesis on the impact of these processes on economic growth in Medieval Europe: a) that the rules of Roman law were conducive to the rise of commerce and economic growth and b) that growth occurred not as a result of the reception of substantive Roman law but rather because of the rational scientific and systemic features of the new law and its training of jurists in the newly established universities. Using data on city population as a proxy for economic growth we find that the decisive impact for economic development was not primarily the content of Roman law, but the emergence of a legal method by glossators and commentators in their interpretation and systematization of the sources of Roman law (Corpus Juris, Digests), which originally consisted of a huge collection of cases. The endeavor to extract general normative conclusions from theses sources led to abstraction, methodology, and the rise of law as a scholarly discipline. Wherever law faculties were founded anywhere in Europe jurists learned new legal concepts and skills which were unknown before and conducive for doing business.
    Download the full text of the paper from SSRN at the link. 

    Call For Papers

    Posted: 25 Apr 2013 07:56 AM PDT


    Call for papers from the Lavender Law Conference & Career Fair



    Lavender Law 2013, San Francisco, CA
    August 22-24Invitation and Call for PapersJunior Scholars Forum 

    Dear Friends and Colleagues,



    This year the Lavender Law® Conference & Career Fair will be held August 22-24, 2013 at the Marriott Marquis in San Francisco, CA. Lavender Law brings together the best and brightest legal minds in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community.

    To celebrate our community of scholars, Lavender Law® is hosting a Junior Scholars Forum again this year. If you are a junior law professor (teaching 6 years or fewer), or a recent law school graduate or fellow who is writing scholarship focusing on the nexus between the law, gender, and sexuality, we encourage you to submit a proposal for consideration. Proposals can be in the form of a full draft or in the form of an expanded abstract (approximately 1-2 pages in length).
    If your proposal is accepted, you will be invited to present your work at the 2013 Lavender Law conference.
    To submit a proposal for consideration, please email your submission to: scholars@lgbtbar.org, and cc: Courtney Joslin (cgjoslin@ucdavis.edu).
    The deadline for submissions is June 15, 2013.



    Read More... Law & Humanities Blog

    Law & Humanities Blog


    The Lure of Poetry and the Law of Punshiment

    Posted: 24 Apr 2013 03:52 PM PDT

    Yxta Maya Murray, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, has published Punishment and the Costs of Knowledge, in Hearing Heaney (Four Courts Press, 2013/2014). Here is the abstract.

    A too-bookish law professor doesn't know if literature has helped refine her position on the death penalty, or just turned her into an insufferable snob: An essay on elitism, bibliomania, confusion, and capital punishment.
    Download the full text of the essay from SSRN at the link. 
    Read More... Law & Humanities Blog

    Law & Humanities Blog


    Law and Trauma in the Work of Art Spiegelman

    Posted: 23 Apr 2013 08:03 AM PDT

    Karen Crawley, Griffith Law School, and Honni Van Rijswijk, University of Technology, Sydney, have published Justice in the Gutter: Representing Everyday Trauma in the Graphic Novels of Art Spiegelman. Here is the abstract.

    Scholars working at the intersection of law and trauma have often turned to literature to supplement the law's version of justice. In this article, we consider what the unique formal properties of comics – which we refer to here as graphic novels – might bring to this pursuit, by reference to Art Spiegelman's Maus (1996) and In the Shadow of No Towers (2004). We suggest that these two works offer a critique of the underlying model of trauma upon which law relies, suggesting alternative understandings of trauma in a mode which is particularly instructive for law.
    Although Spiegelman organizes his treatment of trauma through specific events that have defined the twentieth and twenty-first centuries – the Holocaust and 9/11 – he represents the impact, as well as the ethical and aesthetic questions of these experiences, in ways that radically challenge the supremacy of the event by showing the ways in which the event fails to be contained.Download the full text of the paper from SSRN at the link. 

    Dr. Seuss and Children's Rights

    Posted: 23 Apr 2013 07:59 AM PDT

    Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of Law and Sarah Higinbotham, Georgia State University, have published A Person's a Person: Children's Rights in Children's Literature. Here is the abstract.

    Although the Convention on the Rights of the Child is the most widely ratified human rights treaty in history, children's rights are still seen in many circles as novel and quaint ideas but not serious legal theory. The reality, however, is that the realization of children's rights is vital not only for childhood but for individuals' entire lives. Similarly, although the books children read and have read to them are a central part of their childhood experience, so too has children's literature been ignored as a rights-bearing discourse and a means of civic socialization. We argue that children's literature, like all narratives that contribute to our moral sense of the world, help children construct social expectations and frame an understanding of their own specific rights and responsibilities. Arguing that literature is a source of law for children, we explore children's literature with a view to examining what children learn about their own rights, the rights of others, and the role of rights more broadly in a democratic society. Using Dr. Seuss as a test case, this Article explores the role of children's literature in children's rights discourses. This Article also examines recent empirical work on the benefits of human rights education, connecting that research with law and literature perspectives. Ultimately, this Article aims to connect and build upon the fields of children's rights law, law and literature, children's literature criticism, human rights, and cultural studies to forge a new multidisciplinary sub-field of study: children's rights and children's literature.
    The full text is not available from SSRN. 
    Read More... Law & Humanities Blog

    Law & Humanities Blog


    Original Interpretation

    Posted: 22 Apr 2013 03:08 PM PDT

    Jack M. Balkin, Yale University Law School, is publishing Verdi's High C in the Texas Law Review (forthcoming). Here is the abstract.

    This article continues the discussion that Sanford Levinson and I began over twenty years ago about the relationships between law, music, and other performing arts. It uses as its central example an actual controversy that occurred at the La Scala Opera house in December 2000, when a tenor failed to sing a high C in Verdi's Il Trovatore and the audience erupted in boos, blaming the conductor for a failure of interpretation. Maestro Riccardo Muti defended his choice on the ground that the C does not appear in Verdi's original score; however there is a long tradition of Italian tenors displaying their abilities by signing the high C, and audiences have come to expect it. In fact, one Italian music critic argued that even if Verdi had not written the high C, "it was a gift that the people had given to Verdi" -- an assertion that sounds remarkably like democratic constitutionalism.
    The article proceeds through the many arguments that have been offered for and against Maestro Muti's interpretive position. They turn out to be virtually the same as the arguments that lawyers make about constitutional interpretation. This similarity is not accidental. Like (certain genres of) music and drama, law involves a text that has to be put into action by interpreters before an audience.
    And all three practices involve a "triangle of performance" -- an intricate set of relationships and duties between the creators of texts, the interpreters of texts, and the audiences before whom the texts are performed.
    As a result, in law, music, and drama alike, there are a familiar set of styles (or modalities) of argument that participants generally use to justify their choices about how to bring a text to life, or, in the words of the American Legal Realists, to put law into action.
    Not only are the styles of argument similar, but performances in law, music, and drama are also constrained by traditions and genres of performance. Just as in law, there are certain interpretations in music and drama that are "off the wall" and "on the wall" at any point in time. And, just as in law, these conventions can change over time through determined action by movements and groups.
    The differences between law and the performing arts, however, are just as important as the similarities. Legal performances are usually canonical in a way that musical and dramatic performances are not. It is mandatory to interpret and apply laws in a sense in which it is not mandatory to interpret and perform artistic works like Il Trovatore. Second, at least in the United States, interpretation is hierarchically organized. If a lower court disobeys the interpretation of a higher court, a higher court has the right to reverse it. On the other hand, when Riccardo Muti decides that he is going to perform the G in the Verdi's original printed score instead of the traditional high C, his decision does not have the same effect. Nothing prevents another opera conductor from performing the high C that very same night in another opera house somewhere in the world. And if another conductor does so, there is very little that Muti can do other than criticize. In short, both the similarities and the differences between law, music and drama concern (1) how conventions of performance are organized, defended and enforced, (2) how they are embedded in institutions, and (3) how they change over time.Download the full text of the article from SSRN at the link.

    Edward de Grazia Dies

    Posted: 22 Apr 2013 11:27 AM PDT

    Edward de Grazia, the distinguished First Amendment lawyer, civil rights advocate, and  Law and Humanities Institute founding board member, has died. Mr. de Grazia handled important cases for publisher Barney Rosset of Grove Press, and wrote several influential books about free speech, including Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law of Obscenity and the Assault on Genius (Random House, 1992). Mr. de Grazia also helped found the Cardozo Law School of Yeshiva University. More here from the Washington Post. 
    Read More... Law & Humanities Blog

    Law & Humanities Blog


    Henry at Canossa

    Posted: 19 Apr 2013 12:10 PM PDT

    Frederick Mark Gedicks, Brigham Young University Law School, is publishing True Lies: Canossa as Myth in the San Diego Law Review.
    Here is the abstract.
    This essay is a response to Paul Horwitz, "Freedom of the Church without Romance," to be published as part of a symposium on "The Freedom of the Church." The essay endorses Horwitz's central thesis that advocates of a contemporary "freedom of the Church" have overlooked historical complexities in marking the 11th-century investiture conflict between Henry IV and Pope Gregory VII, often referred to simply as "Canossa" after the small Emilian village where Henry sought absolution from Gregory, as the birth of that freedom.
    The essay goes beyond Horwitz to argue that the historical account of "Canossa" presupposed by freedom-of-the-Church advocates is literally false. "Canossa," instead, is a myth. More salient, nonmythical analogies for a "freedom of the Church" exist in U.S. constitutional history: genuine state sovereignty and dual-sovereignty federalism from the 19th century, and state dignity and native American domestic dependency from the contemporary era. These more historically accessible analogies all suggest that any "freedom of the Church" in U.S. constitutional doctrine is greatly diminished from the robust freedom argued for by those who invoke "Canossa" as that freedom's defining moment.
    But even the mythical "Canossa" remains important. Myths are stories that a society tells about itself, stories that preserve and clarify its deepest values and commitments. Like the "myth of Magna Carta" that has exerted so much influence on English and American constitutional law, "Canossa" emphasizes the dangers to liberty from a government that sees no bounds on its jurisdiction and authority. Though historically false, "Canossa" might yet be mythically true.
    Download the full text of the essay from SSRN at the link.  Read More... Law & Humanities Blog